When size matters – Shooting portraits with the $2,000,000 Leica 1600mm f/5.6 lens

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Leica 1600mm f/5.6

When it comes to rare massive lenses, there are a handful. We recently saw one of them, the Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8, being used for street photography. We’ve also seen it used for portraits. Unusual uses for this $26,000 monster.

But what if we bump the focal length up to 1600mm? And the price up to $2,000,000? Well, then you get the Leica 1600mm f/5.6. This one is extremely rare, with only one being sold and only a few prototypes in existence. But how well does it shoot portraits?

YouTube video

Leica 1600mm f/5.6 – One of a kind

The Leica 1600mm f/5.6 was made for Sheikh Saud Bin Mohammed Al-Thani, the former Minister of Culture of Qatar, at a cost of just over $2 million. It’s the only lens of its kind, in the sense that only one of this lens was ever sold.

In 2000, the Shiekh created the Al-Thani Awards, which grew to become the biggest photography competition in the Middle East, and still is to this day. It’s reported that he had a special Mercedes 4×4 SUV created to lug this one-off commissioned lens around, looking for desert hawks.

I mean, after you’ve spent two mil on a lens, what’s another hundred grand or two for a custom vehicle for it?

Shooting Portraits at 1600mm

Leica itself has prototypes of the lens, with one on display in the Leica store in Wetzlar, Germany. Occasionally, they take it out of the cabinet to let some lucky Leica owner have a bit of a play.

That was the case with Kristian Dowling in the video above, who recently used the lens to shoot portraits inside the Leica store at 1600mm. And as you can see, even with the maximum range they could get in the shop, you’re still seeing barely more than a headshot.

Last month, Marwan El Mozayen, editor-in-chief of the analogue photography magazine and website Silvergrain Classics got his chance to play with it, too. He also shot portraits, but he shot them on film.

YouTube video

Big lenses like these are absolutely ludicrous. Yes, there is a definite demand for them – they wouldn’t exist if there wasn’t – but they’re just so insane that most of us can barely even begin to imagine shooting with one.

Even if the focal lengths of these things aren’t pushing sensor stabilisation to its limits, the size and weight make them pretty unmaneagable for most people. Just impractical in every sense of the word.

They sure look like they’d be fun to play with. The ideal wedding photography lens for someone like me, though. Especially with a 2x teleconverter on there.

[via Sony Alpha Rumors]

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

John Aldred

John Aldred

John Aldred is a photographer with over 25 years of experience in the portrait and commercial worlds. He is based in Scotland and has been an early adopter – and occasional beta tester – of almost every digital imaging technology in that time. As well as his creative visual work, John uses 3D printing, electronics and programming to create his own photography and filmmaking tools and consults for a number of brands across the industry.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 responses to “When size matters – Shooting portraits with the $2,000,000 Leica 1600mm f/5.6 lens”

  1. Nick Delhanidis Avatar
    Nick Delhanidis

    Socially provocative. Especially as the shooting is on film. You definitely are going to hell.

  2. Ken James Avatar
    Ken James

    Wouldn’t it be cheaper to call a Uber to drive you a bit closer with a normal portrait lens? :)