Camera wars: Why cheaper is sometimes better

Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

YouTube video

The battle for megapixels and top-of-the-line specs can be blinding in the camera world. But is a more expensive solution always better? In his recent video, Gerald Undone discusses Sony a1 and Sony FX30 with Patrick, revealing why sometimes a cheaper camera can outperform its much pricier cousin.

The Sony a1 boasts a full-frame sensor, translating to exceptional image quality. It captures more light and detail, ideal for low-light situations. This camera is a powerhouse for photographers and videographers alike.

However, Gerald concludes that a1’s IBIS isn’t quite there yet when it comes to video stabilization. In “standard” mode, you’ll get a natural shake, and “active” mode, while smoother, can introduce unwanted artifacts and rotational issues.

This leads us to the four-times-cheaper Sony FX30. As it turns out, it packs a surprising punch. Despite its APS-C sensor, it delivers fantastic video quality. But the true star of the show is its IBIS. It’s remarkably good, even surpassing other Sony cameras. Whether in “standard” mode for a natural look or “active” mode for extra smoothness, the FX30 delivers stable footage without the jitters or weird effects.

So, why choose the cheaper camera?

As I mentioned, the FX30 costs considerably less than the Sony a1: we’re talking $1.600 vs. $6500. And for videography, especially handheld work, the FX30’s stabilization can be a game-changer. No matter how beautiful the image quality, shaky footage is a viewing nightmare. Gerald concludes that the FX30 allows you to capture smooth, professional-looking videos without needing gimbals or extensive post-production editing.

This isn’t to say the a1 isn’t a fantastic camera. But for videographers on a budget who prioritize stable footage, the FX30 is definitely a compelling option. It offers excellent image quality, exceptional stabilization, and a lighter, more portable body. Remember, the best camera is the one that helps you achieve your creative vision – and sometimes, that means prioritizing features over pure megapixel power.

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic

Dunja Djudjic is a multi-talented artist based in Novi Sad, Serbia. With 15 years of experience as a photographer, she specializes in capturing the beauty of nature, travel, and fine art. In addition to her photography, Dunja also expresses her creativity through writing, embroidery, and jewelry making.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 responses to “Camera wars: Why cheaper is sometimes better”

  1. Ясин Бен Avatar
    Ясин Бен

    it is like saying why is small car better than bugati inside city

    1. Riz Rman Avatar
      Riz Rman

      Ясин Бен they are both Sony so it’s like saying a Toyota is a better buy than a Lexus 😅