OVF vs EVF – A Philosophical Difference

Luigi Barbano

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

OVF vs EVF! Let’s the bloody war begin ;)

 

The world is divided in two… always, that is why there is people making a lot of money selling t-shirts for opposite points of view!

The users of mirrorless camera are not different, photographers loving the optical viewfinder and photographers loving the electronic viewfinder and hating each other.

Since Fujifilm introduced the hybrid viewfinder with the X100 and the XPro we can have the best of both worlds and decide what to use for every picture.

It is surprising for me to see, on various blog posts and comments, Fuji users hoping to have a future release of those cameras without one or the other option when Fuji made the most intelligent move leaving the choice to us. But this is not the point of this article, here I want to concentrate on what I think is the philosophical difference between the OVF and EVF.

Personally, on my Fuji XPro1 I use both but mostly the OVF.

When we look at an EVF we look at the camera representation of the subject on a display, when we use the OVF we look at the framed reality. Basically people that like to preview and create the image in their mind before taking the picture prefer the OVF, people that like to see the world as is seen by the camera choose the EVF.

The mental process is very different. Seasoned photographers that learned to shoot with film are not very influenced in their mental workflow by the camera because they formed it before the existence of the displays, but younger photographers are forming their workflow based on what the camera offers.

Saint Pierre Castle, Aosta Italy. Linhof Master Technika 4×5 with Ilford FP4

The EVF shows the picture with the dynamic range, color balance and contrast of the camera, and gives to us a filtered scene. With the EVF we are looking at a display and the image is already done, we can take it but we do not make it because we are no more looking at the reality and having feeling and emotions created by the real moment.

The dynamic range of reality can be 100,000:1, the best displays can give 400:1 and a print is around 100:1. The art of photography is not only composition but also to interpret the reality so we can communicate the feeling of the very high light differences and the very subtle shades on a medium with a very limited dynamic range.

The same applies for the color gamut and contrast.

Looking at a display or EVF we limit ourselves to its specific characteristics.

Some time ago I was watching the sunset from a pier, I step few feet back from the railing and observed all the people, specially young, looking at the sunset in their smartphone, ready to click every few seconds. They forgot the reality around, what they were watching was a limited frame of reality interpreted by their phone.

There were two groups of teenagers, one males and the other females, spring, beach warm weather and small swimwear at the age when hormones are crazy and they were so concentrated to watch the sunset in the display and share the moment on the social media with their distant friends that they forgot to look around at each other, share the moment with the real people, smile, know each other and have the option to meet and perhaps fall in love!

I see the same limit in the images created by the display/EVF extremists, they forget the reality and what can make a picture great just because is out of the frame or out of the characteristics of the display. This is absolutely evident in prints because the image is not taken thinking at the final printed result but the click is created on the display. You see the images in small size on the social media and are very good, when printed become ugly and boring with a lot of defects and the limits of the display transferred to the print.

Personally I use the OVF to frame the image I had in my mind watching the reality and I use the EVF only sometime to check some parameters as the histogram or the precise composition in case of situations that can procure a parallax problem.

My preference comes from the way I learned to photograph with film and my preferred cameras: Linhof Master Technika and Hasselblad SWC. Both of them had an external viewfinder I used to frame the subject and there was not a way to see the final image until the film was developed and printed.

My usual workflow was to walk in the scene, look around from many different point of view, than get the viewfinder from my pocket (yes was detachable from the camera) to refine my choice with the angle of view of the lenses I had in the bag and only then taking the camera off the bag and positioning it in the right place.

Grandparents kitchen, Occimiano, Italy. Hasselblad SWC with Ilford HP5 film

With the Fuji my workflow is the same, just more comfortable in size, weight and speed.

The average person spends 4 hours a day on internet watching at their computer or smartphone display. Photographers now spend a lot of time watching a display to elaborate pictures. We are modifying ourself to adapt to a display and a virtual reality. As photographer we are looking to produce images that will be good on the social media and will produce a lot of “like”.

The mental process used to create photographies is changing and images are no more created by the mind and sensibility of the photographer but by the camera. Blog articles and tutorials talking about the tools get more views and likes than articles and videos talking about the philosophical and aesthetic aspects.

Take a look at the B&H Youtube channel (I love their event space and the quality of the speakers and content!) a lesson of Sam Abell, one of the best photographer and speaker that made a very inspiring class, has around 22 thousands views in 11 months, the first look at different tools have more than 40 thousand views in 2 or 3 months. If we look at less known speakers (most of the time equally interesting) the difference is even wider.

My suggestion for the new “always digital” photographers is simple: sometime use the OVF, cover the display and take pictures in the old school way. You will improve, discover a real world and make your life better, and perhaps you will be able to see the woman/man close to you looking the sunset and exchange a real smile.

About the Author

Renowned Italian photographer, artist and author, Luigi Barbano divide his life between Italy and the USA. He started his professional career in 1994 with a specialization in commercial and travel photography.  Author of photographic and technical books, in Italian and English, he can be followed and contacted on his websiteFacebook  and LinkedIn.

Luigi likes to promote the good habits of photography and his last publication “Photography: The f Manual” revisits the classical approach to photography, starting from the photographic technique essential basics that are too often forgotten in the digital era. This article was also published here and shared with permission.

Filed Under:

Tagged With:

Find this interesting? Share it with your friends!

DIPY Icon

We love it when our readers get in touch with us to share their stories. This article was contributed to DIYP by a member of our community. If you would like to contribute an article, please contact us here.

Join the Discussion

DIYP Comment Policy
Be nice, be on-topic, no personal information or flames.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 responses to “OVF vs EVF – A Philosophical Difference”

  1. WillMondy Avatar
    WillMondy

    The main reason I still use an OVF is that I haven’t used an EVF that doesnt look strange and doesn’t feel claustrophobic.
    Most are small, dark and you are conscious that you are looking at the screen in focus and not the scene in focus, even if you fiddle with the diopter.

    When they improve, I might switch, but until then I will stick to DSLR’s with an OVF

    1. Sean Avatar
      Sean

      ditto.

  2. Kay O. Sweaver Avatar
    Kay O. Sweaver

    I’m glad I met my wife before EVFs would have made finding love impossible.

  3. Airat Sadreev Avatar
    Airat Sadreev

    As for me it is like ‘film vs digital’ discussion 15 years ago

  4. Ralph Hightower Avatar
    Ralph Hightower

    Luigi, as you mentioned using the sunset scene about taking a step back to view the scene, I did the same myself. I was at the final Space Shuttle launch and I didn’t want to see the entire launch from behind a viewfinder; I also wanted to experience the launch since it was my first and last time to see a Shuttle launch. I shot about five frames of film of Atlantis and yes, my Canon A-1 has an OVF.

  5. Vanitas Foto Avatar
    Vanitas Foto

    This kind of discussions are sooooo boring… It is like they are married to their camera type, viewfinder type, brand, etc.

    You get married with people (your wife, your husband, etc.)

    Why limit yourself to just:

    Digital or Film
    M4/3 or APS-C or Full Frame or MF
    Optical or electronic Viewfinders
    SLR or Mirrorless

    We live in an era where we are spoiled with soooooo many tools too create the image we want with more ease than say 60 years ago… Heck even 10-20 years ago!

    And yet we decide to be silly… How about the phrases:”the right tool for the right job” ? “Horses for courses?”

    This kind of articles “I dont use this because I am stuck on this” only help stagnation of your mind…

    I use my SLRs for studio shoots, mirrorless for location shoots and I get the best of BOTH worlds, I shoot digital and film and I get the best of BOTH worlds, and so on…

    Think of cameras as tools not as spouses and you will open a world of possibilities for you and your photography.

  6. Timothy Spear Avatar
    Timothy Spear

    The whole article is an old codger complaining how the majority of young people have no technique. EVF and OVF have absolutely nothing to do with looking around you. Further, how many of those young people are professional or trained photographers? Then consider those young people in fifty years will look back at the social media posts and be able to recall, while us old people who did not have cameras will depend on out imagination.